Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

""

Economics can help NHS make better decisions for people, says new briefing from Centre for Mental Health

4 December 2019

Targets, spending decisions and postcode lotteries in the NHS can be improved by applying economic theory to practice, according to a briefing published today by Centre for Mental Health in partnership with the Mental Health Network, which is part of the NHS Confederation.

Economic theories relevant to public service provision (Part 2) by Nick O’Shea shows how insights from economics can help to inform decision-making about mental health services. It finds that waiting time targets for mental health crisis services, for example, only tell half the story of what matters to patients. It concludes that expected treatment times would be a better measure of effective crisis care.

The briefing also explores the consequences of a ‘fractured market’ in children and young people’s mental health services, where competition between different commissioners to ‘shunt costs’ to each other has increased the use of high-cost ‘out of area placements’ in beds far from home instead of community-based support. This creates perverse incentives on local commissioners to cut back on community services they pay for and increase reliance on hospital beds that are funded nationally.

The briefing also explores how digital mental health interventions create very different challenges for commissioners than traditional services. Digital services can meet more people’s needs round the clock than face-to-face provision but they are not easily monitored for their quality or outcomes. This means commissioners need to find ways of comparing digital services to get the best possible help for their population’s needs.

Centre for Mental Health chief economist Nick O’Shea said: “Economic theory can help with many of the everyday challenges of commissioning and providing mental health services. It can point to better ways of measuring how well a system is working, it can challenge postcode lotteries in funding and services, and it can help the NHS to achieve better value for money. As citizens, service users, carers and professionals, we all want the NHS to achieve the greatest possible benefit for people’s health. Insights from economics can help us make that a little bit easier in practice.”

Mental Health Network chief executive Sean Duggan said: “Making economic theory approachable and accessible is key to ensuring its positive impact on the delivery of services, and ultimately patient care. The findings of this latest publication show that a successful and reliable mental health service of the future hinges on embracing digital services and developing a more collaborative approach, where incentives for different parts of the system are aligned. Understanding why and how to deliver this is at the heart of achieving that, which is why research and publications like this are an invaluable resource for our healthcare leaders.”

Join us in the fight for equality in mental health

We’re dedicated to eradicating mental health inequalities. But we can’t do it without your support.

Please take this journey with us – donate today.

Donate now

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
 

 

We take care to protect and respect any personal data you share with us.
For information on how we use your data, check out our privacy policy.